I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.

DiscussionLet's talk about it: The science of itCanada cuts off "right to try" fo …

Please to create posts and topics.

Canada cuts off "right to try" for cancer patients?

#1 · March 14, 2026, 1:14 am

https://x.com/MakisMedicine/status/2032463745499205891

William Makis on X: "BREAKING NEWS: Helping Cancer patients is now ILLEGAL in Canada, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith punishes over 9000 Cancer patients for exercising their "Right to Try" with Ivermectin My Cancer work in Canada is officially done. I'm moving to Florida and will work there. 🙏 https://t.co/mbkKEV91PQ" / X

#2 · March 14, 2026, 1:15 am

Post

See new posts
Conversation
Roman Andrzej Śniady reposted
William Makis
@MakisMedicine
BREAKING NEWS: Helping Cancer patients is now ILLEGAL in Canada, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith punishes over 9000 Cancer patients for exercising their "Right to Try" with Ivermectin

My Cancer work in Canada is officially done.
I'm moving to Florida and will work there. 🙏

Helping Cancer patients is now illegal in Canada.
Health Coaching of Cancer patients is now illegal.
Naturopathy is now illegal.
Using Ivermectin and repurposed drugs is now illegal.
Doing podcasts and videos on Health is now illegal.

All punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment.

Canadians have no idea what has just transpired and what Canada has recently turned into.

The actions of Canadian authorities (pictured below, including far left extremist woke bureaucrats of the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons) amount to attempted murder of Cancer patients who wanted cutting edge options for their disease.

Canadians, your options are all GONE.

Please STOP asking me for help at this point.

You could have and should have stopped the Canadian authorities from doing any of this.
There were plenty of opportunities to do so.
Now it's too late.

Of course, Premier Danielle Smith's Alberta government can stop cancer patients from being harmed and reverse all of these actions within 24 hours. But they won't. They intend to kill every last Cancer patient instead.

We are documenting these deaths as they happen.

I've done all I could here, in Canada.
I've gone above and beyond.

When my Florida Cancer Clinic opens, look for me then. It will be BUSY💪

Good luck everyone! God bless 🙏

#3 · March 14, 2026, 1:17 am

I still think ivermectin is a priogenic toxin.

I also think ivermectin is infinitely safer and more effective than chemotherapy.

On top of all that it is now easier to get MAID in Canada than it is to get ivermectin?

#4 · March 14, 2026, 2:18 am

@joe2 bro I said it to you before. Do you really think that it is helpful to spam whole forum with creating thread like this??? Imagine everyone would create 2 new threads every day like this? The forum would go to complete shit. Nobody will find anything here anymore.

I am surprised that @moderator is not saying anything to you about this..

What about simply creating "Joe2 conspiracy theories and stuff" thread and you can post whatever you want in there and not polluting the whole forum?

As you can see not many people are responding or interested in these kind of threads you are making..

Not to mention that it is not healthy for you. I know many older people live by this stuff with reading all kinds of stuff on facebook and X 24/7 and it is their biggest hobby. But I am telling you it is not helpful or healthy for your mind and the whole body. Find a new hobby.. You will thank me later..

#5 · March 14, 2026, 6:31 am

Indeed a single thread would be better for stuff unrelated / remotely related to vA would be better instead of multiple threads with no or few replies (IMHO) .

#6 · March 17, 2026, 9:24 am

What are the odds that the same people wrecking our medical system are the same people who foist corrupted science about vitamin A on us?

Curious that you deem this spam as compared to threads about HG7 ideas.

If memory serves there was a time when the top 10 commenters on this blog consistently posted contrary trolling stuff selling ideas like eating 5 eggs a day and other supplement regimes. But of course that was not spam since those folk had plenty of interaction on their posts, right?

#7 · March 17, 2026, 10:57 am

Quote from lil chick on March 17, 2026, 10:57 am

I do wish that there was some *collating* of the posts. My time working in a library makes me want this place to work like a library. I could be wrong. So, for instance, if you want to post about vaccine theories, post them into an already existing thread about vaxes. If you want to post a theory about gut bacteria, post it on an already existing gut bacteria thread. If you are truly onto a new topic, start a new general thread about that topic.

2. I do guess (and this is a guess) that Grant's intellectual wanderings have led him to a place (and many of us are there as well) that we shake our heads and wonder at the humongus Rabbit-Hole Warren of Cons (what is a con? see below) and realize it is all connected... unfortunately. I think that is why there is a high tolerance here at this site... for posting theories about Cons. (and warning about deception)

Definition: To Con: to persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. A related idea is "a con artist". (a typical example of con artist is a snake-oil salesman at a town fair)

3. I've grown to hate the term "conspiracy theory". It is naive to think people don't join up together to get rich at the expense of others. People even sometimes conspire to do "good". Think of this: the United State of America began as a conspiracy against the British crown! People conspire, it's what they do. Have you ever watched "Survivor"? Often, those who "conspire" early in the game...go on to be the final two! And then they they throw each other under the bus, LOL. Typical!

4. If being non-naive about cons is distinct to my generation, I'm proud of it. But, in fact, my grandmother (greatest generation) was heavy into such theories. (ie, that we are often being conned). She did have blinders on regarding some things (for instance, she seemed to think that doctors walked on water almost as well as Jesus). Back then, many doctors might have deserved such adoration. Of course, during her time, there were doctors who specialized in the frontal lobotomy, (an extremely vile example of a Con Artist) ...so much for adoration. A long life, such as hers, taught her some hard lessons.

I do wish that there was some *collating* of the posts. My time working in a library makes me want this place to work like a library. I could be wrong. So, for instance, if you want to post about vaccine theories, post them into an already existing thread about vaxes. If you want to post a theory about gut bacteria, post it on an already existing gut bacteria thread. If you are truly onto a new topic, start a new general thread about that topic.

2. I do guess (and this is a guess) that Grant's intellectual wanderings have led him to a place (and many of us are there as well) that we shake our heads and wonder at the humongus Rabbit-Hole Warren of Cons (what is a con? see below) and realize it is all connected... unfortunately. I think that is why there is a high tolerance here at this site... for posting theories about Cons. (and warning about deception)

Definition: To Con: to persuade (someone) to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception. A related idea is "a con artist". (a typical example of con artist is a snake-oil salesman at a town fair)

3. I've grown to hate the term "conspiracy theory". It is naive to think people don't join up together to get rich at the expense of others. People even sometimes conspire to do "good". Think of this: the United State of America began as a conspiracy against the British crown! People conspire, it's what they do. Have you ever watched "Survivor"? Often, those who "conspire" early in the game...go on to be the final two! And then they they throw each other under the bus, LOL. Typical!

4. If being non-naive about cons is distinct to my generation, I'm proud of it. But, in fact, my grandmother (greatest generation) was heavy into such theories. (ie, that we are often being conned). She did have blinders on regarding some things (for instance, she seemed to think that doctors walked on water almost as well as Jesus). Back then, many doctors might have deserved such adoration. Of course, during her time, there were doctors who specialized in the frontal lobotomy, (an extremely vile example of a Con Artist) ...so much for adoration. A long life, such as hers, taught her some hard lessons.

#8 · March 17, 2026, 9:28 pm

Quote from Joe2 on March 17, 2026, 9:28 pm
Thank you for your concern for my age related fragility, my health and my time. Appreciate your belief in your superior perspective on what people want and need to see.

Noteworthy that since you see no patterns nor connectivity in patterns that you provide that as proof it is a waste of time for others to discuss them. Suggest that pattern recognition is one of if not the first and most important step for intelligence. Pattern recognition about patterns hopefully leads to exponential growth for intelligence. Lack of pattern recognition is hardly a sign of intelligence.

As to age, this socalled hobby of mine started when I was younger. Gladly I appreciated my librarian. She helped save my life as I read my way out of medical crises before the internet and databases replaced Dewey Decimals and giant index card files. When she got her first fax machine, she laid day old research papers on my desk. Remember getting my first case study on a parasite on a letter head from Riyadh Royal Hospital. She saved me $2,000 in publisher costs my first year working with her.

Please worry less for my geriatric fragility and temporal risks. After 40 years of study, it takes me far fewer hours today on topic than it originally did. Might help to keep in mind, comparing my output to yours in order to extrapolate that I am spending proportionately more time digging than you are is a mistake. I have friends planet wide helping me search up useful stuff. Please be grateful that you are receiving less than 1% of the input I see. My drip feed information flow might seem like a firehose to you. That is hardly my fault nor a problem.

So I appreciate librarians in ways most might miss. I also appreciate how viewing topics from higher altitudes can give the impression that topics are unrelated and disorganized. I am more than a little familiar with the slavish mind kontrol tactic of keeping slaves in their lane. Similar to blinkering draft animals.

Reminds of the old saw about 10 blind sages touching various parts of elephant declaring different beliefs in what they are finding. I wonder if the blind sages would react similarly to a sighted child standing far enough back to take in the whole scene. I wonder how well a sighted child might relate to such sages.

Am old enough (and sperg enough) to remember decades of being accused in conversations of giving too much detail, too much useless context, not enough organization,..... to have provided anything worthy of consideration to the conversation. Accused of reading too much for my health, of reading too much and too many topics,........ Accused of not understanding these topics by people who bragged about not having wasted their time reading these topics. People who insisted they were smarter and better informed because I read 100 hours to their 1 hour on a topic.

Remind much of Faucists ranting about "trust the science" and "trust the experts" and "do not do your own research" much?

So yeh, if I could write like an LLM - an honest and accurate LLM if that is not oxymoronic - I might outline a massive operation by a powerful, organized and much better informed group of people set up to tunnel vision and overwhelm a much larger, much less well informed group of people. I might lay it out in a neat, easy to read, concise format.

I suppose then I might get accused of spoon feeding truths that everyone already knew and condescending to a group of far better informed folk.

Man that pattern recognition thing. If only I could sense a pattern in these criticisms.

Thank you for your concern for my age related fragility, my health and my time. Appreciate your belief in your superior perspective on what people want and need to see.

Noteworthy that since you see no patterns nor connectivity in patterns that you provide that as proof it is a waste of time for others to discuss them. Suggest that pattern recognition is one of if not the first and most important step for intelligence. Pattern recognition about patterns hopefully leads to exponential growth for intelligence. Lack of pattern recognition is hardly a sign of intelligence.

As to age, this socalled hobby of mine started when I was younger. Gladly I appreciated my librarian. She helped save my life as I read my way out of medical crises before the internet and databases replaced Dewey Decimals and giant index card files. When she got her first fax machine, she laid day old research papers on my desk. Remember getting my first case study on a parasite on a letter head from Riyadh Royal Hospital. She saved me $2,000 in publisher costs my first year working with her.

Please worry less for my geriatric fragility and temporal risks. After 40 years of study, it takes me far fewer hours today on topic than it originally did. Might help to keep in mind, comparing my output to yours in order to extrapolate that I am spending proportionately more time digging than you are is a mistake. I have friends planet wide helping me search up useful stuff. Please be grateful that you are receiving less than 1% of the input I see. My drip feed information flow might seem like a firehose to you. That is hardly my fault nor a problem.

So I appreciate librarians in ways most might miss. I also appreciate how viewing topics from higher altitudes can give the impression that topics are unrelated and disorganized. I am more than a little familiar with the slavish mind kontrol tactic of keeping slaves in their lane. Similar to blinkering draft animals.

Reminds of the old saw about 10 blind sages touching various parts of elephant declaring different beliefs in what they are finding. I wonder if the blind sages would react similarly to a sighted child standing far enough back to take in the whole scene. I wonder how well a sighted child might relate to such sages.

Am old enough (and sperg enough) to remember decades of being accused in conversations of giving too much detail, too much useless context, not enough organization,..... to have provided anything worthy of consideration to the conversation. Accused of reading too much for my health, of reading too much and too many topics,........ Accused of not understanding these topics by people who bragged about not having wasted their time reading these topics. People who insisted they were smarter and better informed because I read 100 hours to their 1 hour on a topic.

Remind much of Faucists ranting about "trust the science" and "trust the experts" and "do not do your own research" much?

So yeh, if I could write like an LLM - an honest and accurate LLM if that is not oxymoronic - I might outline a massive operation by a powerful, organized and much better informed group of people set up to tunnel vision and overwhelm a much larger, much less well informed group of people. I might lay it out in a neat, easy to read, concise format.

I suppose then I might get accused of spoon feeding truths that everyone already knew and condescending to a group of far better informed folk.

Man that pattern recognition thing. If only I could sense a pattern in these criticisms.