I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
Canada cuts off "right to try" for cancer patients?
Almost feels like there are patterns to the propaganda AND to the propaganda failures.
Please do self preserve and drink from fire hoses as sanely and pleasantly as possible.
As a kind friend once told me, "Take it easy, but take it."
Uploaded files:
Quote from lil chick on March 17, 2026, 10:57 am
- I do wish that there was some *collating* of the posts. My time working in a library makes me want this place to work like a library. I could be wrong. So, for instance, if you want to post about vaccine theories, post them into an already existing thread about vaxes. If you want to post a theory about gut bacteria, post it on an already existing gut bacteria thread. If you are truly onto a new topic, start a new general thread about that topic.
2. I do guess (and this is a guess) that Grant's intellectual wanderings have led him to a place (and many of us are there as well) that we shake our heads and wonder at the humongus Rabbit-Hole Warren of Cons (what is a con? see below) and realize it is all connected... unfortunately. I think that is why there is a high tolerance here at this site... for posting theories about Cons. (and warning about deception)
A + for "collating" posts. Despite it all being connected, this forum as I understand has a specific purpose. Arriving on a forum and seeing a bunch of threads with alarming titles and no/few replies, even if one does not disagree with the ideas behind, would be a turn-off, and make harder a research for topics directly related to vA.
Boy, Epstein sure was a Renaissance Con Man, eclectic in his interests.
I really enjoy reading all your post! And appreciate your hours of research on the different topics. I agree that it’s all tied together.
Possible start a new thread in the Progress report called “Joes Corner- OT” . Put all your post there. I would subscribe to that thread so I don’t miss all the valuable information you share!
🥰
Appreciate the input @ginny
Had a friend earning PhD while working for Department of Energy. When introduced to other friends in related fields, they clearly felt guilty about career path. Most did not pick up on it. Introduced them to a friend with deeper broader context. Advanced degree in engineering, decades government work, advanced training in military / martial science and history. When introduced, he asked what they did at DoE. Reply was vague about particle physics and accelerators and on. He looked at me and smiled, "Oh, you are making weapons."
I chuckled gratefully while our younger friend stood stunned - shocked. This friend was a student of ours. This older friend was our teacher. It shocked them because no one else had confronted them that their work was actively being applied to weapons technologies. They thought their vague answers were vague enough to hide their real work.
More to the point they could not understand how this work did not bother us. Laid out for them that all technologies are that. Every tool is a weapon. Every weapon is a tool. The guilt for a weapon lies with the user not the maker. Completely different mindset with that new context. That student learned much faster after that.
Up to that point, that person's psyche counselor advised they silo their life more aggressively. Keep people in their life more separated. Keep issues in life more separate. Do not discuss aspects of life openly. Do not integrate ideas. Made for a dang lonely boring life.
Besides the inherent unhealthiness of the idea, I provided examples routinely how this idea smothers processing and innovation. Just as I was smart and wise enough to introduce that student to my teacher, I often suggested simple little ideas that got them over hurdles to processing they were stuck trying to work out. Similar to how a talk with a little guy shakes up a parent's perspective and clarifies a bigger much more complicated problem so that solutions are obvious. Or a chat with a neighbor suddenly brings out the answer to a sudoku or a crossword that previously confounded.
How about if we use this thread as an example. How do we silo all future comments on this topic? Or rather topics, right? Does this mean that any future comments need to be siloed into this thread?
Is the concern that new viewers to the blog will be overwhelmed by appearances when they see so many threads on so many overwhelming, radical and diverse topics? That they will think opinions here are ridiculously wild and pointless? Hm. What was the reason we all first looked at this blog? Were we casually looking around the web and thought, "Wow, this blog looks odd. This guy thinks a nutrient is a toxin. I wonder how plausible this idea is. I sure hope I do not see other wild surprising ideas here while I study up on this one."
Because you know, we all would have studied up on flat earth theory if not for all the moronic comments on flat earth sites about how the Germans had advanced technologies they took to Antarctica and how Kubrick faked the moon landings.
Perhaps we hashtag every comment and every post to make them easier to search? Or perhaps we just limit our comments to one comment/post per person per day?
It might take me some time to search the site but I seem to remember a time when a few of the top 10 commenters in their contrarian thread ranted on about how angry they were because Grant did not believe the standard dogma on virology and the covid narrative. They insisted it damaged their own credibility when they took the idea of vitamin A as a toxin to their physician and asked that he look at Grant's site.
#cancer?
#conspiracy?
#vaccine?
#vaccines cause cancer?
#eugenics?
#epstein?
#gates?
#MedicalAssistanceInDeath?
#euthenasia?
#abortion?
#plannedparenthood?
#fetal tissue sales?
#democide?
#legal liability immunity?
#vitamin A vaccine adjuvant?
#technocracy?
#medical cartels?
#public private partnership = criminal cover up?
Quote from Ginny on March 18, 2026, 8:27 amI really enjoy reading all your post! And appreciate your hours of research on the different topics. I agree that it’s all tied together.
Possible start a new thread in the Progress report called “Joes Corner- OT” . Put all your post there. I would subscribe to that thread so I don’t miss all the valuable information you share!
🥰
I have a feeling that at this pace the whole forum will become "Joe's Corner" in no time.
@joe2 There is *one* off topic HG7 thread, with dozens of distinct, related subtopics, so that the vitamin A topics aren't pushed back too far for people to dig into. With all your threads, I have to click at least 8 times now to find any older vitamin A posts.
A forum isn't like twitter with the same people reading it and scrolling for new content, it's designed to sit around for a while as new people trickle in. The vitamin A movement isn't static, and new people need to be able to see older material.
What I see, from you, is on the order of a hundred, short, off topic threads with just a link to a twitter post or a substack article.
You're basically pasting a subset of your twitter news feed into the forum as it comes in.
We all have news feeds, and I already see much of the same stuff on twitter. News isn't the purpose of this forum: there are websites like twitter for that. Of course there are off topic posts, but it's courteous to confine it to a single thread.
If your posts are valuable, people will read them, even if it's in a corner. But pushing back the older vitamin A posts, which are actually on topic, seems too much to me.
I would be completely embarrassed to do this and find your resistance to a corner to be really strange. I've never seen someone on a forum do this before.
Here is my confusion:
"so that the vitamin A topics aren't pushed back too far for people to dig into"
What pushes back a topic?
