Discussion

I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.

Forum Navigation
Please to create posts and topics.

monsatan's true identity goes mainstream?

Page 1 of 3Next

(32674) Exposing the Monsanto Conspiracy - YouTube

Curious that exposing monsatan is becoming a mainstream accepted fact.

Livy has reacted to this post.
Livy

Very informative video. Thanks for posting that. The truth is coming out...

Joe2 has reacted to this post.
Joe2

2 day old video now has 3.27M views.  Channel has 18.7M subscribers.

youtube and google are one company.  Google merged with GlaxoSmithKlein a long time ago.  Veritasium is one of the most pharma / corporate compliant websites out there.  The host gave Billious Gates a tongue bath for 13:13 minutes on this video.

I Asked Bill Gates What's The Next Crisis?

So my question is why is Bayer marketing how evil Monsanto has been.  Monsatan and Bayer have been evil since forever.  Billious Gates is one of the bigger shareholders.  Bayer bought Monsanto at their low price while in a crisis over lawsuits.  Their reason for buying Monsanto was access to Monsanto's control of farmers.  It goes way beyond the monopoly on gmo seed crops.  

Monsanto owned software and intellectual property rights to global positioning systems and maps to every farm in US to allow robotically controlled farming.  

So why is Bayer and Billious throwing Monsanto under the bus so hard?  Why not let the alternative media do it on our own?  Given Veritasium's new involvement, I expect to see 60 Minutes and CIAndy Cooper do a groundbreaking comprehensive expose on Monsatan soon.  Is this the same as when tobacco companies paid hundreds of millions to keep cigarettes from being FDA regulated and then in one year paid tens of millions lobbying to get cigarettes regulated by FDA?

Shannon has reacted to this post.
Shannon

Could be so many things - pure speculation: 

eg demonising Facebook and breaking up monopoly so Open AI can step into that market 

saying Teflon is bad but then re-positioning/re-using in air fryers instead

being so powerful that they want us to know how much power they have and (psychological) that there is no escape (fear, control) 

wanting us to know and cause an uprising so they can then clamp down using control methods 

making us focus on that so we ignore other things being done 

making us think the regulators are doing their job 

Why did the tobacco companies do that? 

 

 

 

Joe2 has reacted to this post.
Joe2

@tanveen

My first reply to your list is "all of the above."

My answer to your question was worked out by a number of investors and lawyers like RFK2, Mike Pappantonio and others.  Tobacco companies had enormous profits beyond what could be banked back in the day.  Cigarette profits were enourmous on a product that cost a penny or 2 and sold for a dollar.  Government was not complaining either since taxes on cigarettes are every bit as profitable.  So there was never ever a danger of tobacco companies losing money.  No matter how much juries awarded victims and states required signs warning people.  Plenty people in the world still smoke and profits in last 40 years have only gone up by magnitudes.

At the time that big tobacco lost their first jury trial, they started buying up other companies.  Bought up all the big food companies so that now no one even knows tobacco companies by their names.  They think they are just food companies.  These companies kept growing their monopolies throughout other industries.

During all this time, pushing back on regulators by insisting tobacco is not a drug kept their costs down.  Also during all this time, small producers and farmers started growing and spreading.  Similar to small breweries today.  At a point where big tobacco wanted their monopoly protected and spread downward, it became more profitable to be regulated by an FDA they controlled (think revolving doors and payments to FDA similar to how Pfizer does it) than to not be regulated.  

It no longer cost them money on lobbyists to hold off the FDA.  Instead they paid the FDA directly with fines and licensing fees as pharma does on drugs.  FDA derives most of their funding from the people they regulate.  How harsh is FDA going to be on the people who pay them?  Add to that, all the regulations are too expensive for small producers and farmers to afford.  Overnight, big tobacco's competition from smaller companies was destroyed.  

Of course I could be wrong though.  It could be that big tobacco just paid a scientist who told them the truth and they realized that tobacco is a drug deliver system.

Climate change and bioterrorism 

Vaclav smil - geomagnetic storm 

Joe2 has reacted to this post.
Joe2

What is it you like about Smil?  

Is it his vaccine shilling for Billious Gates?  Or his covid shilling for Billious Gates?

Click to access Vaclav-Smil_-The-12-innovations-we-need-to-save-humanity-and-the-planet-_-New-Scientist.pdf

Click to access 31.VACCINATION.pdf

I believe that nothing that is put on the plants is as poisonous as the plants themselves. When I went carnivore 3 yrs ago I researched all my favorite plant foods. As an example okra was something I grew and canned and ate every day. As it turned out every one of those little seeds in the okra pod is coated with cyanide, the plant's defense against being eaten. The powers that be know this. They would rather people be concerned with the external poisons than realize that the actual plants that the poisons are being applied to are poisonous themselves. The thing is you can't patent meat. All their poison packaged foods and medicines are made from plants and industrial wastes which in combination can be patented. What's one chemical concoction or company in the grand scheme of things?  Its like the old Roman thing of gathering to watch a bad example being thrown to the lions. It's Bread and Circuses for the masses.

Joe2 has reacted to this post.
Joe2

Amend that please.  They can not patent meat, yet.  That is the real purpose of mRNA and gmo technology.  That is why so many US Supreme Court justices have strong ties to Monsatan.  That is why it was important to the kleptocratic class to get a Supreme Court ruling that intellectual property rights gives Monsatan the right to crush farmers in court over their gmo crops.  

Disagree on plants being more poisonous than the poisons applied.  Glyphosate is a tad more pernicious than the little bit of cyanide we pick up in okra.  Plus it is nigh impossible to live on okra calories as well as we live on wheat, corn or other grain calories.  Last I read, wheat is typically coated with glyphosate 8 times before it gets to our plate.  Now it is being applied to wildland forests in Canada.

I do agree on what you speculate the kleptocratic class' reasoning is on spraying toxins everywhere.  

BTW, okra's oxalates were rougher on me than the cyanide.  Man I loved that stuff.

Look up ‘Glyphosate litigation and settlements’ 

https://news.sky.com/story/man-who-claimed-weedkiller-caused-cancer-gets-2-1bn-payout-13333847

Joe2 has reacted to this post.
Joe2
Page 1 of 3Next
Scroll to Top