I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
The Virology Controls Studies Project - Substack: The Magic of Enzymes
@ggenereux
I would encourage you to read the work of Jamie Andrews (Substack) as he digs deep into the 'science' of PCR and the chemistry of enzymes, DNA, etc. (I'm not going to lie, I would be really interested in your take on the matter).
In my humble understanding, Andrews is destroying the science of medicine, human health, chemistry, etc... one article at a time.
Modern teachings of these subjects seem to rely on CGI and symbolic diagrams to illustrate what is supposedly happening at the cellular level in the human body. This is because we can't see what is actually happening. Scientists rely on microscopes and dyes to substantiate the scientific discoveries made, or should I say, made up, a century ago.
Case in point - enzymes. I heard you say in an interview that retinal(dehyde) is converted to retinoic acid via the enzyme retinal dehydrogenase and that this happens in the nucleus of the cell.
Does it? How do we know? Because a textbook says so. Because Chatgpt says so? Andrews looks into enzymes in one of his many Substack articles and really makes them sound like complete nonsense.
On the one hand, enzymes don't need energy to function, then they do, they are proteins that speed up reactions in other proteins but not in themselves because, just because, they can't be seen but fluorescent dyes apparently show them up in electron microscope images that are hardly even comprehensible let alone proof (except to special & super-smart scientists).....
On the other hand, It has been demonstrated that chemical reactions are influenced by acids, temperature and pressure.
Are enzymes made up? Just to add another layer of confusion for the lay person trying to understand or to shut up that annoying student who asks too many questions. Just to bamboozle anyone who is actually trying to understand cellular functions, viruses, vaccines, etc...?
I don't know.... but I am starting to question everything about cells and cell processes. How much of it has been skewed or tainted by madeup processes and components?
What are the implications for our understanding of the science and research on vitamin A? Obviously this doesn't change anything you have concluded about it - it is still a plant toxin the body doesn't want and has to detox. But, all the different chemical forms and pathways it takes. If the research is so wrong about enzymes, what else is wrong? How can we trust anything they say if it is all based on lies?
Thanks for your reply but I think you might have misinterpreted what I wrote. I am saying that enzymes might be a fallacy, just made up BS to add another layer to a false understanding of the human body that supports drugs and vaccine use.
Jamie Andrews is on Substack under the title of this post. Substack is free to read and his posts even have a button up the top that have an audio function if you would rather listen. His posts are not too long. The problem, like any idea that is novel, is getting people to read something longer than a tweet! (Andrews is on X too by the way and is great to follow).
I highly highly recommend people having a look at his work. Garrett Smith follows his work also and mentioned Andrews in his interview with Grant. (Some people on here might not find that a great endorsement but I respect Garrett's work enormously - he has devoted his life to exposing the vitamin A fraud after all and kudos to him for that important work).
Andrews researched enzymes and their discovery to find the usual amateur and ridiculous scenarios we have come to know and expect from these early 'scientists' - that a French press was used plus hydrochloric acid, some sugar and voilà, enzymes were born. It really is that stupid. A Nobel Prize in the midst to seal the deal and we know what that means - calculated scheming from the very top.
It is very much like the early vitamin A experiments with animals - totally absurd.
Like Grant, Andrew is all about citizen science and encourages people to run their own experiments on RAT to try and see what RAT and PCR are actually measuring because he has shown that even genetics and DNA are implausible.
How do I highlight Grant's name in this post? I have tried but it isn't coming up red. @ggenereux ?