I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
Please
Login to create posts and topics.
Trichomonas causing cancer ?
Quote from
grapes on February 1, 2022, 12:56 pm
I'm in a middle of a fascinating read on a theory/discovery that cancer would be caused by trichomonas, unicellular parasites. It was made by a Russian researcher Tamara Svisheva in 1989-1990 (the book states that theories on parasitic origin of cancer first appeared long before)
It's been quite a long time since then, but I was not aware of this theory neither if it was "debunked". The book states that it faced mainstream opposition, which is normal.
Some points I have gathered so far:
- Human hosts 3 species of trichomonas (mouth/gut/vaginal), vaginal being the most pathogenic
- In their free/isolated form they are mistaken for human cells lymphocytes/macrophages
- cancer tumors are conglomerates of these parasites in cystic form. They can present themselves also in amoebic and flagellate forms.
- experiments were made where cancerous cells were placed in conditions favoring trichomonas, and they changed their form into amoebic and flagellate.
- most (if not all) people host these organisms, some get it even pre-birth, and also by other means as hygiene, sexual transmission. What causes the disease are environmental factors, like ionizing radiation, stressors like smoking or alcohol. Regarding our forum main topic, possibly retinoids/vitamin A fit somewhere into these?
My feeling is this theory sounds more logical than the actual one, that our normal cells just somehow switch themselves into cancerous ones. Feel free to contribute or ask questions (I'll pay attention as I read), I don't know if the book was translated in other languages, or if you understand Russian you can buy her books or find them online.
I'm in a middle of a fascinating read on a theory/discovery that cancer would be caused by trichomonas, unicellular parasites. It was made by a Russian researcher Tamara Svisheva in 1989-1990 (the book states that theories on parasitic origin of cancer first appeared long before)
It's been quite a long time since then, but I was not aware of this theory neither if it was "debunked". The book states that it faced mainstream opposition, which is normal.
Some points I have gathered so far:
- Human hosts 3 species of trichomonas (mouth/gut/vaginal), vaginal being the most pathogenic
- In their free/isolated form they are mistaken for human cells lymphocytes/macrophages
- cancer tumors are conglomerates of these parasites in cystic form. They can present themselves also in amoebic and flagellate forms.
- experiments were made where cancerous cells were placed in conditions favoring trichomonas, and they changed their form into amoebic and flagellate.
- most (if not all) people host these organisms, some get it even pre-birth, and also by other means as hygiene, sexual transmission. What causes the disease are environmental factors, like ionizing radiation, stressors like smoking or alcohol. Regarding our forum main topic, possibly retinoids/vitamin A fit somewhere into these?
My feeling is this theory sounds more logical than the actual one, that our normal cells just somehow switch themselves into cancerous ones. Feel free to contribute or ask questions (I'll pay attention as I read), I don't know if the book was translated in other languages, or if you understand Russian you can buy her books or find them online.
Quote from
Даниил on February 1, 2022, 6:45 pm
Hi Grapes, have you ever heard of pleomorphism? Gaston Naessens, for example, was a researcher of this phenomenon.
I understand Russian, but I haven't read her books. But offhand, based on what you wrote, it could explain these inconsistencies. I believe in VA theory, and I also believe that VA may cause our usual cells to take such bizarre forms of various "infections".
It's quite possible that I'm wrong, but I think this may give you another line of research.
Btw, there are a huge number of parasites.
Hi Grapes, have you ever heard of pleomorphism? Gaston Naessens, for example, was a researcher of this phenomenon.
I understand Russian, but I haven't read her books. But offhand, based on what you wrote, it could explain these inconsistencies. I believe in VA theory, and I also believe that VA may cause our usual cells to take such bizarre forms of various "infections".
It's quite possible that I'm wrong, but I think this may give you another line of research.
Btw, there are a huge number of parasites.
Ourania has reacted to this post.
Quote from
grapes on February 2, 2022, 12:23 am
Hi @daniil , yes I've heard of pleomorphism and Gaston Naessens. As long as I understand concerning trichonomas pleomorphism is a well known and observable fact, but for normal human cells it would be a speculation. Does official cancer theory qualify transformation of normal cells into cancerous as pleomorphism, and if not why ?
Hi @daniil , yes I've heard of pleomorphism and Gaston Naessens. As long as I understand concerning trichonomas pleomorphism is a well known and observable fact, but for normal human cells it would be a speculation. Does official cancer theory qualify transformation of normal cells into cancerous as pleomorphism, and if not why ?
Quote from
Даниил on February 2, 2022, 1:09 pm
Quote from
grapes on February 2, 2022, 12:23 am
Hi @daniil , yes I've heard of pleomorphism and Gaston Naessens. As long as I understand concerning trichonomas pleomorphism is a well known and observable fact, but for normal human cells it would be a speculation. Does official cancer theory qualify transformation of normal cells into cancerous as pleomorphism, and if not why ?
Official medicine does not admit pleomorphism, at least of human cells.
Quote from
grapes on February 2, 2022, 12:23 am
Hi @daniil , yes I've heard of pleomorphism and Gaston Naessens. As long as I understand concerning trichonomas pleomorphism is a well known and observable fact, but for normal human cells it would be a speculation. Does official cancer theory qualify transformation of normal cells into cancerous as pleomorphism, and if not why ?
Official medicine does not admit pleomorphism, at least of human cells.
Quote from
Ourania on February 4, 2022, 11:22 pm
@daniil and @grapes I think that the attitude towards pleomorphism is probably a philosophical/political point. It is a bit like the refusal of the reality of the possibility of switching genes expression during ones life-time. For most of the Western world epigenetics was bogus, just because it contradicted the Nazi racist ideology, and because it was a Soviet science. And also contradicted creationist ideas that influence most of the judeo-christian-muslim world.
Darwin is still being attacked.
Now that a French girl has invented the CRISPR scissors we are thrown into a world that not only recognizes epigenetics, but will try to make money out of it.
How long before the dawn of pleomorphism? Not long I think. The idea that vA has a role in this is brilliant.
@daniil and @grapes I think that the attitude towards pleomorphism is probably a philosophical/political point. It is a bit like the refusal of the reality of the possibility of switching genes expression during ones life-time. For most of the Western world epigenetics was bogus, just because it contradicted the Nazi racist ideology, and because it was a Soviet science. And also contradicted creationist ideas that influence most of the judeo-christian-muslim world.
Darwin is still being attacked.
Now that a French girl has invented the CRISPR scissors we are thrown into a world that not only recognizes epigenetics, but will try to make money out of it.
How long before the dawn of pleomorphism? Not long I think. The idea that vA has a role in this is brilliant.
Даниил has reacted to this post.
Like this:
Like Loading...
