I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
Radio interview with Grant
Just listened to it now.
I always wonder if somehow Roche gets a hold of these guys, gives them a few grand and gets them to sign a non-disclosure contract.
Obviously all debate is healthy, but he came across as so obnoxious, unintelligent and self absorbed in his ill-informed and unsupported statements. On top of that, was constantly cutting Grant off.
Seems this guy never read Grant's books and preferred to shut down any real discussion with wild tangents and cross topics.
That Mark Wahlberg like whine makes me want to punch him in the face.
What a knob / shill
Hi Keero,
I did feel it was maybe a bit of an ambush, rather than a genuine interview. But, I have no hard feelings over it. And, obviously, I should have done a better job of it too.
On one hand, I find it odd that people want to defend a molecule. On the other hand, their defensive position probably originates from them wanting to support other theories, diet plans, and products they are selling, etc. On a positive note, there’s the old saying: “you know you are over the target when you start catching flak”.
Of course, this is a big and complicated topic with a lot of moving parts. It’s still very much in the theory stage and it has a long way to go.
Everyone is entitled to their views, but from an engineering perspective science is never solved in debates. In engineering, science is almost always solved with math, given we have satisfactory mathematical models to use. Since we don’t have strong mathematical models in this context, we need to rely on real-world experimentation.
So, I just want to say thank-you so much to everyone for taking on this experiment, and participating in it. Nature gets to make the final call on it.
Grant, have you always been this mellow? Depression, anger, and rage are symptoms of vit. A toxicity. Maybe this is the solution for ending our modern epidemics of mass murder, explosive rage, and suicide.
Too bad you did not mention eye support suplements efects and last blood test results when he asked about it and alergy. Other than that it was nice to hear you. I'm eaten by stress in such situations so I think you did fine.
Quote from ggenereux on April 19, 2019, 11:12 amHi Keero,
I did feel it was maybe a bit of an ambush, rather than a genuine interview. But, I have no hard feelings over it. And, obviously, I should have done a better job of it too.
On one hand, I find it odd that people want to defend a molecule. On the other hand, their defensive position probably originates from them wanting to support other theories, diet plans, and products they are selling, etc. On a positive note, there’s the old saying: “you know you are over the target when you start catching flak”.
Of course, this is a big and complicated topic with a lot of moving parts. It’s still very much in the theory stage and it has a long way to go.
Everyone is entitled to their views, but from an engineering perspective science is never solved in debates. In engineering, science is almost always solved with math, given we have satisfactory mathematical models to use. Since we don’t have strong mathematical models in this context, we need to rely on real-world experimentation.
So, I just want to say thank-you so much to everyone for taking on this experiment, and participating in it. Nature gets to make the final call on it.
Grant,k
I'm trying to bring Joe Rogan's attention to you so he can interview you! He's a curious, no nonsense,straight talking interviewer. I think it would be a great opportunity to bring attention to this subject to a huge audience.
Would you be interested?
Hi Grant, I listened to the interview and you did great. You were very level headed.
I'm reading Poisoning for Profits and I have to take it in small sections because it is so hard for me to reverse my thoughts I've held so tightly for so long. Other times it just makes me want to throw in the towel re: our world.
To me the interviewer should have been a bit more aware of the details of your stance, but considering he wasn't... well he seemed to decide to agree to disagree sometimes. That isn't a bad thing, really. It still allows airing of both sides.