I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
Vitamin A plus environmental toxins (lithium/aluminum/mercury)
There’s a study by Mathew Daley looking at aluminium and asthma (it made me think of the aluminium and fish gills, epithelial cells comment above)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36180331/
I found the study through this reference to it on the GAVI (pro vaccine,Gates) website
https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/major-new-study-finds-no-health-risks-aluminium-childhood-vaccines
In the books Grant mentions that cancer patients may have eczema (I think it’s in the breast cancer book - makes sense if it’s a further poisoning). I wonder if a similar pattern is found with cancer and asthma? (As eczema and asthma are often said to be linked in children).
Big Pharma
Study Showing 13% of Kids Have 2 or More Allergy-Related Conditions Overlooks Role of Aluminum and Vaccines
New research investigates the progression of allergies from eczema to food allergies to asthma in children, but overlooks vaccines as a potential trigger. Experts cite evidence linking aluminum adjuvants and food proteins in vaccines to allergy development.
by Monica Dutcher
July 27, 2023
kid allergies asthma vaccine feature
6194 Pageviews
RSS
Republish
Print
Share
8 Comments
New research published Tuesday in the journal Pediatrics validates a phenomenon known as the allergic — or atopic — march, which refers to how allergic diseases progress in a person beginning in infancy.
In the largest study of its kind, researchers from Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data collected between 1999 and 2020, from more than 200,000 pediatric patients ages 0 to 18. Their goal was to uncover patterns and prevalence of allergic disease.
Dr. Stanislaw Gabryszewski, a fellow in the Division of Allergy and Immunology at CHOP who led the study, said in a press release:
“Allergic diseases are one of the most common causes of impaired quality of life in children, so to improve the diagnosis and care of children with these diseases, it is important that we have an accurate understanding of how widespread they are, and the risk factors that are associated with them.”
The study found that children, on average, tended to be first diagnosed with eczema at 4 months old, then food allergies and asthma around 13 months, allergic rhinitis — or hay fever — at 26 months, and a rare food allergy called eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) at 35 months.
Peanut, egg and shellfish were the most commonly diagnosed food allergies.
A total of 13.4% of children had two or more allergic conditions. Patients with respiratory allergies like asthma and allergic rhinitis tended to have both conditions.
Dr. David Hill, a pediatric allergy expert at the University of Pennsylvania and one of the study’s authors, told CNN, “If a child is diagnosed with one form of allergy, their likelihood of developing a second form is much higher than the general population.”
The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Pennsylvania Allergy and Asthma Association and a CHOP Food Allergy Pilot Award. Additional infrastructure funding was provided by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Researcher: ‘We should immediately stop multiple vaccines being administered simultaneously’
To examine non-biologic factors that may affect predisposition to allergies, the researchers analyzed demographic trends.
Missing from their analysis and from mainstream reporting on the study was any mention of the link between childhood vaccines and allergies — or even why eczema develops in the first place.
Jonathan Jay Couey, Ph.D., Children’s Health Defense (CHD) staff scientist, told The Defender that it’s “difficult to understand what the authors hypothesize” because “they are only looking for what they want to find: racial disparities.”
Brian Hooker, Ph.D., CHD’s senior director of science and research said:
“I find it incredible that the authors of the Pediatrics paper overlooked vaccines as a potential cause of allergies given that even the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has made the connection between aluminum in vaccines and asthma as well as eczema.”
Hooker was referring to a CDC-funded study showing that children who received 3 milligrams or more of vaccine-related aluminum had at least a 36% higher risk of developing persistent asthma than kids who got less than 3 milligrams.
According to The Associated Press, experts have criticized the study for its various shortcomings, including failure to account for the effects from other potential aluminum exposures — such as in the air or through diet.
When the research was published last September in the journal Academic Pediatrics, Christopher Exley, Ph.D., an expert on aluminum toxicity, weighed in on the methodology, telling The Defender:
“It [the CDC study] is a classic aluminum industry study appearing to surrender some possible toxicity of aluminum (in vaccines) while actually delivering multiple messages signaling the safety of aluminum in general.”
Hooker told The Defender about an analysis he conducted with Neil Z. Miller of the Institute of Medical and Scientific Inquiry to better understand health outcomes in vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
“We saw an odds ratio of 4.49 (statistically significant) for asthma in vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children. This was limited to vaccines in the first year of life,” Hooker said. “The CDC seems to be confirming my results here.”
Hooker and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., chairman on leave from CHD, have a book coming out next month — “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak” that reviews more than 100 peer-reviewed studies of vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations and analyzes, in the context of those studies, the health differences among infants, children and adults who have been vaccinated and those who weren’t.
A large-scale, Japanese birth cohort study demonstrated that the prevalence of asthma, wheeze and eczema in children at 12 months old was associated with the administration of a larger number of types of inactivated vaccines at the initial immunization before 6 months of age.”
Unlike live-attenuated vaccines, inactivated vaccines use components of the killed virus or bacteria which, because they cannot self-replicate, require an adjuvant (aluminum is often used) to provoke an immune response.
The Japanese researchers said they “strongly support the global vaccination strategy,” while admitting the results of their research “support the reconsideration of better vaccination development in the future.”
There has long been evidence that food proteins in vaccines cause the development of food allergies. In the abstract of a study published in the Journal of Developing Drugs, researcher Vinu Arumugham wrote:
“Many studies since 1940 have demonstrated that food proteins in vaccines cause sensitization in humans. Allergens in vaccines are not fully disclosed. No safe dosage level for injected allergens has been established.
“As a result, allergen quantities in vaccines and injections are not regulated. … It is well recognized that many currently approved vaccines have enough allergen to cause anaphylaxis.”
Arumughan concluded that, given the unknown risk factors, “we should immediately stop multiple vaccines being administered simultaneously.”
Potentially concerning findings on EoE, allergy trends among racial groups
According to U.S. Pharmacist, EoE prevalence has increased over the past two decades, nearly doubling in both adults and children, and occurring in an estimated one in 1,500 to 2,000 persons.
The CHOP study researchers also found that EoE, which has historically been considered a disease affecting primarily white males, is more common among non-white patients — now at 40% — than previously reported.
Meanwhile, a disproportionate number of kids with eczema and asthma were Black.
Couey said:
“A possible explanation for the racial disparity the authors see could be related to income. Lower income children may be more likely to receive more vaccines at once than children from higher-income families who have better insurance and can take their children for regular well visits to receive vaccines on a [more protracted] schedule.
“… It seems the authors are also working under the assumption that allergies develop as a normal consequence of childhood.”
This assumption is unlikely, Couey added, and “stands in stark contrast” to the findings discussed in “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak.”
Monica Dutcher
Monica Dutcher
Monica Dutcher is a Maryland-based senior reporter for The Defender.
Here’s Where Aluminum Goes When It’s Injected Into Your Body from… – The Vaccine Reaction
Here’s Where Aluminum Goes When It’s Injected Into Your Body from a Vaccine
by Arjun Walia | Guest Writer
Published May 31, 2016
Ingredients, Vaccination
FacebookTwitterEmailReddit0Pinterest0Copy LinkPrintFriendly+ Share This Article
While mercury (Thimerosal) has been removed from most vaccines, it is, unfortunately, still included in some vaccines for children and the elderly, and in some vaccines administered in certain developing nations. There are over 150 studies on organic-mercury used as a preservative in various vaccines, and over a dozen of them found outcomes of death, malformation, autoimmune reactions, neurodevelopment disorders, and more.
The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) may assert that Thimerosal is safe, but concerns over its safety still led them to remove it from most vaccines. The crazy thing is, its safety was based on the conclusions of fewer than 10 studies, all of which were sponsored by the CDC. Hundreds of other publications, on the other hand, have been raising concerns about it for decades. (source)
Are we going to see the same thing with aluminum in the near future?
While we have been adding aluminum to vaccines for approximately 90 years, many people remain unaware that appropriate safety assessments (toxicity studies) have not been conducted for the administration of vaccines containing aluminum as an adjuvant. Government health authorities have been putting aluminum in vaccines based solely on the assumption that they are safe. Because vaccines have been perceived as non-toxic substances for decades, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not attempted to prove the safety of this particular vaccine ingredient. Considering billions of dollars have been paid to families of vaccine injured children, I think it’s fair to say this is an alarming state of affairs. (source)
Here is a quote from Dr. Jose G. Dores, a professor at the University of Brasilia’s Department of Nutritional Sciences who recently published a study in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. In the study, he offers the following observation: “Despite their long use as active agents of medicines and fungicides, the safety levels of these substances have never been determined, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children.” (source)
It wasn’t long ago when mercury was removed from vaccines, thanks to numerous studies demonstrating its toxicity, so I am hopeful that steps will soon be taken to remove aluminium from vaccines as well, it being a known neurotoxin. Below are some important reasons why now is the time to stop putting this substance into our bodies.
Aluminum From Vaccines vs Aluminum in Our Environment
The administration of aluminum into vaccines is most commonly justified by the fact that a person usually accumulates more aluminum in their body each day simply by eating, but what people fail to take into account is that your body has a different method of flushing it out of your system. They body is very good at doing this, it was designed to do this, but when you inject aluminum as a vaccine adjuvant, it does not come into the same mechanism of excretion as it would, say, from the aluminum you accumulate in your body as a result of wearing deodorant.
Injected aluminum does not enter the body or leave the body in the same way as environmental aluminum. It doesn’t come into the same mechanism of excretion, and that’s the whole point of adjuvants, they are meant to stick around and allow that antigen to be presented over and over again. It can’t be excreted because it must provide that prolonged exposure of the antigen to your immune system
If it’s not being excreted by the body, then where does it go? A fairly recent study published in Frontiers of Neurology explains how this biopersistence—demonstrated by its “capacity to migrate in lymphoid organs and then disseminate throughout the body within monocyte-lineage cells and progressively accumulate in the brain”—is so troublesome.
It also points out that, “in spite of their long usage, the literature has pointed out that the adjuvanticity mechanisms of aluminum salts remain basically unknown despite most active investigation in the field in recent years.”
A study published in BioMed Central (also cited in the study above) in 2012 found more cause for concern:
Intramuscular injection of alum-containing vaccine was associated with the appearance of aluminum deposits in distant organs, such as spleen and brain where they were still detected one year after injection. Both fluorescent materials injected into muscle translocated to draining lymph nodes (DLNs) and thereafter were detected associated with phagocytes in blood and spleen. Particles linearly accumulated in the brain up to the six-month endpoint; they were first found in perivascular CD11b+ cells and then in microglia and other neural cells. DLN ablation dramatically reduced the biodistribution. Cerebral translocation was not observed after direct intravenous injection, but significantly increased in mice with chronically altered blood-brain-barrier. Loss/gain-of-function experiments consistently implicated CCL2 in systemic diffusion of Al-Rho particles captured by monocyte-lineage cells and in their subsequent neurodelivery. Stereotactic particle injection pointed out brain retention as a factor of progressive particle accumulation.
The study went on to conclude that “continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier or high constitutive CCL-2 production.”
Here is a video of Dr. Christopher Shaw, a neuroscientist from the University of British Colombia, Canada, discussing this in detail.
The list of studies showing the biopersistence of aluminum via vaccines is well established in scientific literature. The entire purpose of including aluminum in vaccines in adjuvant form is to ensure they remain in the body, so what argument could possibly be raised against these concerns?
Aluminum is An Experimentally Demonstrated Neurotoxin
Dr. Christoper Exley is a professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry and an honorary professor at the UHI Millennium Institute. He is arguably the world’s leading expert on aluminum toxicity, and in 2008, along with fellow researchers, he published a paper in Medical Hypothesis where he argued that it can be reasonably assumed that, if the efficacy of aluminum adjuvant in vaccines “is based upon the mode of action which we have described herein (refer to paper), then a situation could occur when their use results in an anarchic immunological response and a cascade of unwanted health effects.” He also stated that aluminum salts are the most effective adjuvants in use today, and that their widespread application over decades is testimony to their success and safety. That being said, it’s also important to realize that this is assumed safety, not proven.
Since this paper was published 8 years ago, countless people have called for proper toxicity testing of aluminum in vaccines to take place, but it still hasn’t happened.
According to Chris:
Just imagine, you have a higher than normal body burden of aluminum. You are potentially accumulating it in certain areas in the body. You then receive multiple vaccinations, all of which contain some aluminum. In those multiple vaccinations, aluminum is acting as adjuvant and antigen, it sets off cascades of potential responses which I believe potentially can then cascade around the body, setting off potentially other stores of aluminum, whether they be in the brain, or the bone, the connective tissues, the places where we might expect to find high or raised levels of aluminum. Could this type of cascade effect explain why an aluminum adjuvant could then in some individuals only, produce such adverse effects? … Many of the adverse affects that you see in people who have suffered following vaccination are very similar to the known effects of aluminum intoxication. (source)
In this same video, he explains how to eliminate aluminum from the body.
A growing number of studies have linked the use of aluminum adjuvants to serious autoimmune outcomes in humans. (source) (source) (source) (source)
“Experimental research … clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans.”
– Dr. Lucija Tomlijenovic (source)
There are numerous studies which have examined aluminum’s potential to induce toxic effects, and this is clearly established in medical literature, and has been for a long time. (source)
If significant aluminum load exceeds the body’s capacity to eliminate it, it is deposited into various tissues that include bone, brain, liver, heart, spleen, and muscle. Aluminum is found in cigarettes, cosmetics, food, medicines (aspirin), and much more. It’s in our environment, and we are surrounded by it; it is present in countless products we use every day, which simply wasn’t the case prior to the Industrial Revolution. And we know, thanks to the work of Richard Flarend, that aluminum is commonly absorbed into the body, into areas it shouldn’t be, and has been found in various urine samples from multiple studies examining this topic.
“We increasingly have this compound that was not part of any biochemical process on Earth, that can now only go and do havoc, which is exactly what it does. It causes all kinds of unusual biochemical reactions.”
– Dr. Chris Shaw, a neuroscientist and professor at the University of British Columbia (source)
(28043) Brain Fitness in the Aluminum Age - Preventing Alzheimer's - YouTube
(28043) Silica Water - Silicade How to make it at home - YouTube
Has anyone seen information on methods of getting aluminum out? Fiji water? Horsetail tea?
Doing HTMA in ARL/TEI lab and doing their program. So you target all elements not just aluminium and yes Silica is great for detoxing aluminium. You have all kinds of supplements and sources of silica. Not many people have money to buy Fiji water. It is not even available in my country. I was taking Geosilica from Iceland. I think that's great supplement for silica.. But Like I said I would recommend hair analysis in ARL or TEI lab and folowing their program. YOu will start detoxing all kinds of stuff evn essential stuff like copper, manganese etc.. Iron is also huge problem for older males especially..
Quote from Jiří on August 12, 2025, 12:57 amDoing HTMA in ARL/TEI lab and doing their program. So you target all elements not just aluminium and yes Silica is great for detoxing aluminium. You have all kinds of supplements and sources of silica. Not many people have money to buy Fiji water. It is not even available in my country. I was taking Geosilica from Iceland. I think that's great supplement for silica.. But Like I said I would recommend hair analysis in ARL or TEI lab and folowing their program. YOu will start detoxing all kinds of stuff evn essential stuff like copper, manganese etc.. Iron is also huge problem for older males especially..
These last 3 years have me doubting the necessity of copper and manganese. Curious about horsetail tea as silica source.
Have known older males so dinged up on iron they turn grey after a hamburger. Required frequent blood draws. Damaged livers from decades of alcohol.