I needed to disable self sign-ups because I’ve been getting too many spam-type accounts. Thanks.
AI take on virology
More plausible explanations are everywhere. Unbacked definitive statements are the hallmark of concensus scientists - aka fraud.
Extreme claims require extreme evidence. Virology is lacking. Vaccinology is lacking. Evidence that other plausible explanations are implausible is lacking.
Did a Vaccine Experiment on US Soldiers Cause the ‘Spanish Flu’?
Did a Vaccine Experiment on US Soldiers Cause the ‘Spanish Flu’? - LewRockwell
Another hallmark of consensus science - aka fraud - is self contradicting definitive statements and ad hominem attacks.
How many times do we dismiss simpler obvious cause and effect before we grok them?
Can You Shoot Through a Windshield? Real Test with Unexpected Risks
How many examples of hubris, arrogance and willful ignorance in spite of all evidence indicating otherwise do we need?
Ignaz Semmelweis much?
Pellagra as contagion?
Safe and effective? Did you get your tenth booster of a vaccine that does zero to stop transmission yet? After mandates on the jabs to stop the disease and two weeks to flatten the curved turned into 4 years to digital slavery?
Does the Mod's comments not show up on the thread?
Uploaded files:
Yes, poisoning for profits, as Mr. Genereux puts it, for millennia.
More links on how virology is a pseudoscience; books, blogs, documentaries, etc.
https://odysee.com/@MattiasRahm:c/Viruskritiskt_kallmaterial:7
I love all this, especially the historical stuff about the flu epidemic (which had horrific consequences throughout my family tree) but please explain chicken pox. I remember my mother chatting with another mother in the neighborhood on the phone. She decided to expose us on purpose so that we wouldn't get it as adults, and it worked. Then, when I became a mom my older child caught chicken pox at school and gave it to my younger child. It's always the same disease, it seems to be spread via the air from kid to kid, and then to all the kids in the house who haven't had it yet. And almost all kids get through it fine. And now that they vax for it kids don't get it! The current viral model seems to fit so well.
My long dumps on the previous page show that I've been thinking about this for many years, but still no one has replaced the model in my mind of what viruses are.
If the model is bad lets throw it out-- but what is the new model? I'm open for a new one, but one hasn't presented.
That is awful about the guy getting glass dust in his lungs, and it is a cautionary tale, and it is interesting that detox and sickness are so similar. 1917 does seem to be about vaxes (and aspirin too) and experimenting on people has to stop. And I agree that mask-wearing seems dangerous. And that people do seem to have blinders on about boosters that do more harm than good. People in general need to push back and be more suspicious of everything that is foisted upon them. It usually isn't really about health, it usually is about profit.
But how did person A give his cold to person S at home? How did S pass it to to R at thanksgiving? How did R then give it to K at work?
Besides the common cold, we need to explain Flu, Herpes, Mono, hepatitis, HPV, norovirus, rotavirus, mumps, rubella, molluscum...ebola
These and others all have their identifying traits, and are passed around.
If we extrapolate from the 1917 debacle, which seems to have actually been bacterial... Are all these things actually bacterial too? I've heard that theory. So why don't antibiotics help?
People thought anti-parasitical helped during covid, and horse paste was bought up from all the grain stores because drug stores refused to fulfill orders of every-day parasitical meds (for some reason). Do they protest too much? Are these diseases about parasites? Perhaps much like malaria.
My thread on worms talked about how parasite science seems to be very dumbed down for some reason. Patient: Doc, look at the wriggling worms in my stool! Doc: let me prescribe an anti-depressant.